tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38671384.post6403224839871613268..comments2024-03-18T20:32:20.647-07:00Comments on Dale's Wargames: Falling Dominoes of the MindDalehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13667428218897971037noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38671384.post-28421910877189191992018-12-17T15:59:41.904-07:002018-12-17T15:59:41.904-07:00I agree about the brain-waking part. One of the re...I agree about the brain-waking part. One of the reasons that I now play at least one test game with the rules before coming out with a final review. Some concepts on paper don't seem right until it hits the table and vice versa.Dalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13667428218897971037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38671384.post-9889056520321600062018-12-06T05:13:51.008-07:002018-12-06T05:13:51.008-07:00Its interesting to note that these days, my brain ...Its interesting to note that these days, my brain seems to tend to immediately jump towards what's "wrong" with a different idea instead of looking for what's "right" with it. Might be in danger of morphing into an old codger.<br /><br />I suppose lightly armoured, big gun "Tank destroyer" units would be classed as antitank guns rather than tanks or else the power of their guns could be reflected in a higher defence value than their armour would normally rate because the enemy would be forced to act more cautiously when attacking it. <br /><br />Other abnormal cases such as the 1940 Matilda's with heavy armour but only an HMG can probably be considered an anomaly that could be dealt with using a scenario specific rule, perhaps not allowing them to combine their firepower or something. <br /><br />Always good to wake the brain up.Ross Mac rmacfa@gmail.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04053555991679802013noreply@blogger.com